semiotic_pirate: (halcyon mirrored sunglasses)
[personal profile] semiotic_pirate
As an update to this post, I found the source of the study that the article was based on through [livejournal.com profile] shogunhb. More comments on this?

Date: 2005-09-29 02:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] surelle.livejournal.com
I think that the study's concept is a humungous undertaking, and I'd like to know more about the methodology. It doesn't seem like they are using a lot of data sources; while they say it's "a first look", I would want to look at different data sets documenting "societal success" , preferably those that aren't gathered through the UN or WHO, in addition to the original data sets. Something like the Human Relations Area Files (http://www.yale.edu/hraf/about.HTM), for example. Someone mentioned quality of life in the earlier post and I think that would be worth looking at. It's just that there is SO much material to go through, statistically... so many parameters in this study... I think it would be wise to break it down into smaller chunks.

The charts are interesting... but I'd need to see more info :D

Date: 2005-09-29 02:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] semiotic-pirate.livejournal.com
yeah, that's the thing... it is fascinating (as a concept) but not too believable when you know it was one person collating all this data. and yes, more sources would be better... as well as perhaps breaking the whole down into smaller independent chunks that don't know what the other teams are doing getting results about etc.

good concept/idea, I'd want to see all of whatever it is that got him to this point.

oh, and I think I'm going to need your help to get ideas on where to get data for types of things I'm trying to ascertain for my non-thesis research paper.

Date: 2005-09-29 02:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] surelle.livejournal.com
Only one person? Yikes.

Sure, I'd be glad to help! We can brainstorm at the Big E or something ;)

Date: 2005-09-29 02:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] villagecharm.livejournal.com
Again, I think the study is bogus. Any study comparing the United States to countries like Denmark, Holland, Austria, and Sweden that doesn't take into account the fact that there are more people in California than in all those states combined isn't going to be very informative. How about comparing individual U.S. states to some of these countries? There are more people in Massachusetts than there are in Austria - why not compare them? The U.S. is too big and too diverse for comparisons to small, unitary societies to be informative.

I'd be willing to speculate this researcher probably already had this conclusion in mind, and found data and methodology to support it.

Profile

semiotic_pirate: (Default)
semiotic_pirate

April 2017

S M T W T F S
       1
2 345 6 7 8
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 17th, 2025 10:08 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios