Nov. 21st, 2006

semiotic_pirate: (masked wine taster)
I was reading a post of [livejournal.com profile] sunfell's today and fell to wondering about the infinite mysteries. The pendulum of science and religion that continues to swing also came to mind.

Given the fact that every time mankind has been confronted by reason and logic, most especially that which displaces us as being the center of the universe and at the forefront of the consciousness of whatever possible creator(s) the universe has... that every time mankind is disrupted by this it goes through the throes of denial, whereupon whoever thought up this penultimate blasphemy is persecuted (or most likely killed) along with anyone who supports their idea. The sun does not revolve around us, neither does the galaxy our world resides in, nor the wider universe itself. Women are not made to revolve around men, and yes, we are descended from "lower forms of life" just like all the other life forms on this planet.

Each time a major breakthrough is made in science this backlash occurs. The Enlightenment was followed by Romanticism, was it not? Most people fear change and change is what will occur, sometimes in spades, when a new discovery is made that displaces us even further from that imagined center. We begin our lives as the (perceived) center of attention, the center of our mother's/parent's lives. Heck, if you think of gestation, we literally ARE existing at the center for a while. Displaced by birth, displaced over time to lonely individuality, displaced by the ever increasing dearth of knowledge about everything.

Cognitive dissonance. That is what we are faced with as a species. Every time change occurs in our lives, in our perception of that life and in everything else we experience the jarring jangle of dissonance. We are under the impression that we actually control anything, because by relating ourselves to the universe in some supreme way we think that we ourselves are supreme in some mystical way. Too much cognitive dissonance and you will get a backlash.

There will always exist a spectrum, however, it is the existence of too many people at the extremes of this spectrum where we encounter problems. Right now the spectrum is heavy on the fanatic religious belief side. Moreover, those religions are ruled by "laws" that say "if you aren't with us, you're against us" and those Others MUST be destroyed or converted. Fear of Others goes hand in hand with fear of change. And this fear of change is why people who feel they are backed into a proverbial corner will react viciously to any challenge to their beliefs, their perceived authority and anything else that they consider ordained or sacred.

Because this spectrum will always exist, railing against it and trying to expunge it will only increase the self-righteous defense of the extreme positions on that spectrum. There is also the built-up power structures that exist in support of the extremes... actually there are power structures existing across the spectrum but they too go through waning and waxing periods of strength in that power. That power is given willingly by people who only ask to be protected from any changes that they are terrified of.

Again, there is also our relatively short lifespans that come into play. This is why the pendulum can swing to either extreme within a couple of generations. We don't think long term enough to consider the full weight that change, that new innovations and new technologies and so forth represent. We only think of the immediate effects to our selves. Because we exist for such a short period of linear time, unless we have considered leadership that knows our weaknesses as a species and who hold the best interests of the species as a whole higher their own individual interests we will only progress in little spurts of back and forth movement where, hopefully, the net movement is forward.

Of course, watching five episodes of the BBC's Torchwood series is bound to start me thinking about the wider consequences of our collective actions.

Your thoughts? Opinions? Disagreements? Come forth and discuss!
semiotic_pirate: (Default)


Police to fingerprint on streets
Police across England and Wales are to begin taking fingerprints while on patrol using mobile electronic devices.

The portable gadgets - similar to a pocket PC and linked to a central database - will enable officers to identify suspects within minutes.

Police say they will particularly help identify people using false identities, although fingerprints can be taken only if a person gives permission.

Ten forces will pilot the machines over the next year.

The equipment will be distributed among the forces in Bedfordshire, Essex, Hertfordshire, Lancashire, North Wales, Northamptonshire, West Midlands and West Yorkshire, as well as to British Transport Police and the Metropolitan Police, over the next two months.

Combat false identities

Police Minister Tony McNulty said: "The new technology will speed up the time it takes for police to identify individuals at the roadside, enabling them to spend more time on the frontline and reducing any inconvenience for innocent members of the public."

Under the pilot, codenamed Lantern, police officers will be able to check the fingerprints from both index fingers of the suspect against a central computer database, with a response within a few minutes.

"The handheld, capture device is little bigger than a PDA," said Chris Wheeler, head of fingerprint identification at the Police Information Technology Organisation PITO.

He continued: "Screening on the street means they [police] can check an identity and verify it.

"And if they verify it on the street and the person is currently not wanted by anyone but is known to the system for a reason - that is sufficient for fixed penalty notices."

Currently an officer has to arrest a person and take them to a custody suite to fingerprint them.

Electronic safeguards

Bedfordshire Police is the first force to rollout the trial.

The device will be used with the Automatic Number Plate Recognition team, who identify vehicles of interest.

If a vehicle is stopped, police will be able to identify the driver and passengers. At present about 60 per cent of drivers stopped do not give their true identity.

The device has an accuracy of 94-95% and will be used for identification purposes only.

It sends encrypted data to the national ID system using GPRS - a wireless system used by many mobile phones.

More than 6.5 million fingerprints are cross-referenced and sent back to the officer.

"It's a first to search a national database and get a response back in a couple of minutes," said Mr Wheeler.

The information on the device is encrypted and there are electronic safeguards to prevent misuse, if the machine was lost or stolen.

Screening device

Electronic "live scan" machines used in police stations remain the principal method for fingerprinting suspects for evidence.

Live scan machines have a 99.5% accuracy rate and are used in conjunction with a fingerprint expert.

"We have a national programme which will mean by the middle of January 2007 every custody suite in England and Wales and most in Scotland will have a live scan unit installed, " said Mr Wheeler.

He likened the mobile device to breathalysers used by officers on patrol.

"It's simply a screening device. It's the same as using a breathalyser on the street and using a calibrated one back at the station."

PITO provides technology such as the National Automated Fingerprint ID System, called Ident1, to the police.

Profile

semiotic_pirate: (Default)
semiotic_pirate

April 2017

S M T W T F S
       1
2 345 6 7 8
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 19th, 2025 12:52 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios